DC Super Hero Girls Fashems Fashion Fun Series 1 Lot 29 Display Box Squishy of jhnvbo2157-TV & Movie Character Toys

Featured Videos
Images to Share
Recent Podcasts
DC Super Hero Girls Fashems Squishy Fashion Fun Series 1 Lot of 29 Display Box
moneyinyourpocket-featured

DC Super Hero Girls Fashems Fashion Fun Series 1 Lot 29 Display Box Squishy of jhnvbo2157-TV & Movie Character Toys

Yes, à la carte, non-standard banking services like check cashing and payday loans can seem predatory, but we have to acknowledge the place they fill if we want to understand why people use them and answer the question of whether they should.LEGO Batman Catwoman Catcycle City Chase (6858)

mike-stenhouse-avatar

At $888 per year for each of Rhode Island’s 1 million residents, a family of four is paying over $3,500 annually for excessive compensation deals for government workers, while the basic needs of their own families are being ignored by politicians.VINTAGE MARX 1970’s LONE RANGER CARDED THE CROOKED GAMBLER OUTFIT UNUSED

Star Wars Lego 8038 Battle of Endor NEW MIB MISB SEALEDWith almost two-thirds of these excessive costs being heaped upon municipal taxpayers, the report further estimates that property taxes could be reduced by 25% if more reasonable, market-based collective bargaining agreements were negotiated.

Minion 10 Inches Interactive Talking And Action Plush Tamblyn Minion Stuart Mi

DC Super Hero Girls Fashems Fashion Fun Series 1 Lot 29 Display Box Squishy of jhnvbo2157-TV & Movie Character Toys

SPOILERS about Avengers: Endgame ahead.

I agree with Jonah Goldberg more than I disagree with him, but sometimes a guy has to stand firm in what he believes.Super Wings Space Moon Rover Car Transform Toy Astro Robot Airplane Season5  Of all the complaints one can make about the last of the Avengers movies (at least in this cycle), inconsistency about its treatment of time travel is not one of them.

I should note that I think the movies’ conception of how time works is pure fantasy not applicable to reality, but if one accepts their physics framework, the story is just fine.

Seemingly in order to make a fun reference to the Back to the Future movies, the smarter characters explain that it isn’t possible to go back in the past in order to change the present.  The heroes live in a world where the bad guy, Thanos, has used the Infinity Stones to wipe out half of all life in the universe.  The problem is that the people whom they left behind when they went into the past would still be in a future in which Thanos had already accomplished his goal.  It would be along a different time stream that Thanos had failed. Lego Star Wars Predotyp Form Spider Man Sdcc Nycc Seltenere als Mr gold Undoing what has already been done is a logical impossibility if we accept a tangible universe.

Jonah’s complaint is about the end of the movie.  Once the world is saved, Captain America travels into the past to return the stones to their proper times, and he doesn’t return.  It turns out he’d decided to stay in the past and live out a lifelong retirement with his one-time love.  But then… there he is, as an old man sitting nearby a few seconds after the younger him had gone into the past.  Weren’t we already told that changing things in the past put you on a different time stream?

Yes, but we’ve also seen evidence that two copies of the same person could exist alongside each other.  Indeed, Captain America had to fight with himself!  Jonah’s complaint is that Captain America’s staying in the past would have changed reality in all sorts of unpredictable ways, but as long as he stayed quiet and lived as a regular Joe far away from the action of the Avengers, he would have done nothing logically incompatible with the world of the story that we’ve been following over the past eleven years.  For all we know, he was out there all along.VINTAGE 80s TOY CHEST WOODEN BOX RARE UNICORN

justinsandwichplate-featured

DC Super Hero Girls Fashems Fashion Fun Series 1 Lot 29 Display Box Squishy of jhnvbo2157-TV & Movie Character Toys

It appears that another embarrassing Rhode Island story has captured the imagination of the nation: Lunch shaming, or giving students a minimal meal when their parents have built up a tab for school lunches.  Locally, the topic has been around for quite a while; it was a topic in Megahouse Variable Action Hi-Spec Spacetime Orguss 2 General Soldier Figure New from April 2017.

In a nutshell, my take was to suggest that we’ve lost our way if we’re having public policy debates about how school districts should deal with parents who are deadbeats when it comes to lunch money.  I mean, can you imagine a private school shaming their customers’ children over a $5 lunch tab? LEGO, THE NINJAGO MOVIE, GARMA MECHA MAN, KIT PCS, NEW IN BOX 2017 The whole attitude is different, even to the point of seeing students and their families as customers rather than something more like wards or even burdens.

The expansion of that attitude rears its head in a policy proposal that is making its way through Rhode Island’s brain trust:

[Elizabeth Burke Bryant of RI Kids Count] is advocating for the approval of a community eligibility provision which would provide free and reduced lunches to all students and avoid singling out children based on their family’s finances.Vintage Nice Cap Gun Double Dual Holsters Belt Leather Metal Cowboy West

The community eligibility provision, which is part of Governor Gina Raimondo’s proposed budget, would provide free meals for all students within districts that have a large percentage of low-income families.

The unhealthy perspective engendered by big government has had the unhappy consequence of shaming children.  The solution, we’re told, is to expand government further into the role of parents, thus expanding the reach of the big-government attitude.  This will have consequences for Rhode Island families that can be as disastrous, in aggregate, as they are unmeasurable.Battle B-daman three complete sets and three marble loaders.

Providing for your children is part of what makes parenthood worthwhile.  Packing a lunch with love is one of the most straightforward and basic expressions of that responsibility.

Go away, big government.  Let us be families.

The dynamic is reminiscent of the argument that government schools have to instruct all children according to the state’s beliefs about sex because some minority of parents will do a poor job educating their own children. MEGO Superman 1977 12 inch figure In the case of school lunches, statists don’t want to single out children who need help funding lunch, so they’re going to edge in on the relationship of most parents and their children.

← Older posts...